The Irish Times – Opinion: National monuments must be protected by clear laws

carrickminders10

Carrickminders prevent removal of medieval defensive fosse at Carrickmines Castle, 2002

Vincent Salafia: National monuments must be protected by clear laws

Many ancient heritage sites face destruction under next capital investment plan

The Irish Times | Tue, Oct 27, 2015

Thirteen years ago, a small, diverse group of concerned citizens called “Carrickminders” entered the site of the Carrickmines Castle, south Dublin. We aimed to prevent the imminent demolition of roughly half of the newly discovered national monument, to make way for the M50 motorway. After we won two successful Supreme Court injunctions, then minister for the environment Martin Cullen rushed the National Monuments (Amendment) Act 2004 through the Oireachtas, described as “emergency legislation to enable work to resume”. Demolition of the national monument went ahead, after we lost our third Supreme Court case, and the M50 opened in 2005.

Now, after years of post-excavation work, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council has published a Draft Carrickmines Castle Conservation Plan 2015-2025 on its website for public consultation. I have reviewed the 73-page plan, prepared by the council, the National Roads Authority (NRA), and the Heritage Council. There is one glaring omission; it fails to state that Carrickmines Castle is a national monument. No document on the website states this, and I had to email the council to get additional reports sent and found the reference buried on page 279 of Vol One of the Excavation Reports . It states:

“The significance of Carrickmines Castle and surroundings as a national monument lies in its unique defensive outworks, its having formed part of the group of castles and linear earthworks forming the boundary defences of the Pale, and its uniquely large and varied selection of Leinster Ware.”

National monument status was central to all three Supreme Court cases on Carrickmines, which resulted in the Department of the Environment instructing the council to complete this Conservation Plan in the first place. Omission of national monument status from the Carrickmines Conservation Plan highlights the urgent need for review of State and local heritage policy and the 2004 Act. The act was widely condemned because it was not limited to just Carrickmines, but it also empowered the minister to demolish every newly discovered national monument on every motorway route in Ireland, without an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). It was used to demolish hundreds of national monuments that had been discovered by the NRA during road building, in order to deliver the National Development Plan. On one road alone, the N9-N10 (Kilcullen-Waterford toll road), 14 lesser-known national monuments were identified and demolished.

Viking town.

In 2003, a potential Unesco World Heritage Site, a virtually intact Viking town, was discovered at Woodstown during construction of the N25 Waterford bypass. Up to 4,000 inhabitants and an impressive fleet of ships once thrived there. It was declared a national monument, subjected to salvage archaeology, and then demolished. Later, in 2007 a rare wood-henge was discovered along the M3 motorway route, at Lismullen, beside the Hill of Tara. It was voted one of the Top 10 most important discoveries in the world in 2007 by Archaeology magazine. The World Monuments Fund, which had placed Tara on its list of 100 most endangered sites, wrote to the minister pleading for its preservation. The European Commission sent the government a “reasoned opinion” that the 2004 Act was in breach of EU law, and directed the minister not to demolish the site. Demolition order Former minister for the environment Dick Roche declared it a national monument and then issued a demolition order.

The European Commission took Ireland to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) over Lismullen and won, in 2011. The ECJ held that “by excluding demolition works from the scope of its legislation transposing the EIA Directive, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive”. The ECJ decision was not widely reported and the Government quietly added new legislation in 2012 and 2013, by statutory instrument, bypassing parliamentary debate.

The ECJ decision, condemning the 2004 Act, effectively overturned the third Supreme Court decision on Carrickmines, as well as the High Court decision, dismissing my case against M3 motorway at the Hill of Tara. It also negated all ministerial orders and excavation licences issued for predemolition salvage works on all newly discovered national monuments, under the 2004 Act. With a new set of major infrastructure projects proposed under the Capital Investment Plan 2016-2021, and sites such as Brú na Bóinne Unesco World Heritage Site potentially under threat, it is critical the proper legislation and policy be adopted, and remain in place this time.

Fiduciary duty

National heritage is a public trust. A constitutional amendment, and comprehensive legislation, is needed in order to permanently entrench the ECJ decision. It should place a fiduciary duty of trusteeship on the State to protect national heritage, and recognise citizens’ human rights to its effective conservation. This will prevent not just needless demolition of priceless national monuments, but prevent taxpayers’ money being wasted on long construction delays, massive archaeological excavations, and epic court battles. The Draft Carrickmines Plan is a fitting starting point for a national debate on the matter, and all political parties in the general election should clearly state their positions in their election manifestos.

Public consultation on the Draft Carrickmines Castle Conservation Plan 2015- 2025 ends on November 6th. See dlrcoco.ie

Vincent Salafia was a spokesman for the Carrickminders and TaraWatch groups. He is a former lecturer in environmental legislation and planning and risk assessment at Queen’s University Belfast

Protecting Our Heritage

Letter to the Editor | The Irish Times | 29 October 2015

Sir, – Vincent Salafia’s article and warnings on our heritage and its abuse was urgently needed (“National monuments must be protected by clear laws”, October 27th).
In September I visited the Tara Skryne Valley with friends.
We visited a souterrain; a legally-protected, numbered monument but one without a sign, fence or markings; and one where it appears a farmer has been driving his tractor over. Soon, we assume, it will crumble.
Across the fields from this, one can see the mounds neighbouring Rath Lugh and although mentioned in the medieval Metrical Dindshenchas one of them is or has been used as a gravel pit. Nearby at Collierstown, a fulacht fiadh was bulldozed this year, while at Tara itself, Rath Laoghaire is used each winter as a sheep-feeding station and here too a tractor appears to have been casually driven across a protected monument.
I could go on and on! Politicians including Taoiseach Enda Kenny, the National Monuments Service, An Taisce and the local authorities are regularly notified by us about this but nothing is done.
Visiting the once sacred remnants of our past one sees only signs of abuse and destruction.

– Yours, etc,
JOHN FARRELLY,
Drumcondra,
Dublin 9.

FURTHER READING:

An act designed to facilitate roads and real estate by Vincent Salafia | The Irish Times, Opinion, 17 August 2004

carrickminder

Vincent Salafia (on the right) pictured at Carrickmines Castle, September 2002

heritage

The view from inside the siege of Carrickmines Castle, 2002-2003 as work on the M50 was halted on each side of the site, due to Supreme Court injunctions

carrickminesgate

This entry was posted in Carrickmines Castle, Cultural Preservation, Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Protection, European Law, Heritage Campaigns, Hill of Tara, Human Rights, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply